Fact is, “emotional” data collected inside is not valid. Repeated studies have shown that data collected by inside sources yields very different results from data collected by outside, objective, third-party agents.
Most student engagement surveys describe various dimensions of student behavior but fail to: (1) inform as to the real reasons for delayed graduation and withdrawal, and (2) propose meaningful alternatives. To truly understand the student perspective, students must be asked to directly respond to questions about their education goals and intentions, classroom preferences and expectations, and academic and social integration activities. Additionally, the questions must explore alternatives and recommendations for improvement.
With graduation rates hovering at 50%, colleges are facing escalating scrutiny to improve these percentages. Therefore, the “voice of the student” has never been more important. Utilizing sound research practices in determining students preferences, expectations and intents will provide administrators the necessary data to significantly improve the student experience and graduate more students.
The Work Institute offers customized solutions to get to the root of how people respond to your organization. With our emphasis on verbatim comments and live behavioral interviews, we get the best information—so we can give you the best information.
Fact is, “emotional” data collected inside is not valid. Repeated studies have shown that data collected by inside sources yields very different results from data collected by outside, objective, third-party agents.