Already a client? Log in here.

On-Boarding Analysis

On-Boarding Analysis provides valuable information regarding the preferences, expectations, and intents of new hires that companies can use to improve retention rates. Repeated studies have shown that employees who are “engaged” in the first 90 days are much more likely to stay than those who become quickly “disengaged”. Understanding the unique factors that affect new employees during the on-boarding process is necessary to build a strong workforce and increase retention.

Generate Reliable Workforce Intelligence to Know:

  • When do new hires begin to consider leaving? How does the company cause this to occur?
  • What expectations do new hires have regarding their job? Is the organization meeting them?
  • Are new hires’ expectations aligned with the company’s expectations for them?
  • What are new hires’ biggest concerns about the company? How and where can interventions resolve this issue?
  • What would new hires recommend that the company do to improve the on-boarding experience?

Key Benefits of effective On-Boarding Interview Process:

  • Successfully develop on-boarding practices unique to the organizational environment
  • Help new hires acquire a better understanding of their role within the organization
  • Learn job procedures more rapidly
  • Gain a sense of community and belonging

Employee retention starts on an employee’s first day. Those critical first days will make a lasting impact and will greatly affect whether or not that employee becomes a strong contributor to the organization. Gaining feedback from employees during this critical time is necessary in getting employees started on the right track.

Contact us to let us know what we can do for you.

Why The Work Institute

The Work Institute offers customized solutions to get to the root of how people respond to your organization. With our emphasis on verbatim comments and live behavioral interviews, we get the best information—so we can give you the best information.

Fact is, “emotional” data collected inside is not valid. Repeated studies have shown that data collected by inside sources yields very different results from data collected by outside, objective, third-party agents.